The Backstory
History
Arts for Social Cohesion (ASC) is an outgrowth of the Guy Mendilow Ensemble (GME). Especially since the pandemic, ASC has widened partnerships beyond performing arts organizations on which GME focused since its founding in 2004. Today, partners and collaborators also include:
•Interfaith initiatives focusing on antiracism (e.g. Temple Israel of Boston & Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church);
•Entrepreneurship programs training future leaders to craft equitable institutional cultures that are safe for candid expression of diverse perspectives, concerns and questions (e.g. Babson College’s Foundations of Management and Entrepreneurship, Wellesley MA);
•Performing arts organizations (e.g Celebrity Series of Boston, Krannert Center for the Performing Arts, Urbana, IL)
•Schools and after-school programs (e.g. Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston, Sumner Club, Roslindale, MA);
•Historical Societies seeking to expand notions of their community’s living history by recognizing the multiplicity of residents’ backstories (e.g. Lexington Historical Society’s emphasis on including women and people of color in Lexington history).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f11a1/f11a13453b973d198884cb086aa068db403b1c2d" alt=""
What Problem(s) Does ASC Address?
Composer/performer, educator and facilitator Guy Mendilow launched ASC out of the feeling that to navigate today’s pressing complexities — as well as remarkable opportunities — people and communities need as much imagination, adaptability and humanity as can be mustered. And yet, on individual, community, institution and national levels, these are stymied.
For example, Mendilow is concerned with the intensification and calcification of high conflict. A social-work-turned-legal concept, high conflict is typically marked by a dangerous reduction of complex people and situations into simplistic binaries — usually a distinct “us” vs monolithic, dehumanized “them,” whether Black vs White, Good vs Evil, Republican vs Democrat, etc.
It is vital to differentiate high conflict from healthy conflict, or “friction that can be serious and intense but leads somewhere useful,” as author Amanda Ripley writes, often expanding humanization rather than collapsing it. While healthy conflict requires neither agreement with, nor permission for others’ viewpoints and choices, when wisely navigated, it can result in increased understanding of the perspectives, experiences and circumstances underlying surface actions and talking points.
The way out of high conflict generally starts with people’s experience of being understood and accepted as they are, irrespective of agreement. Yet a paradox of high conflict is that it shuts down people’s willingness to listen and learn. Instead, high conflict frequently self-perpetuates through confirmation bias, or the tendency to interpret events and details as further evidence for one’s preexisting beliefs. By blocking its own exits, high conflict easily becomes all-consuming and totalizing, to the point that even listening to a member of the opposite identity can jeopardize one’s status and story-of-self.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8870/e8870bd2406028d0d1609a803b649d1dea8bca91" alt=""
The Arts & Belonging
Mendilow has a long record with the use of moving arts experiences to cultivate belonging. It stretched from childhood participation in one of Johannesburg’s only integrated churches at the height of Apartheid to masters-level research and workshop development for Arab, Israeli, Pakistani and Indian educators using improvisation to set the stage for mediation. This experience was lent theoretical lenses through data from organizations like Columbia University’s Difficult Conversation Lab or StoryCorps. All suggest that the power of questions, and the stories to which those questions lead, can further entrench high conflict by reinforcing binaries or create conditions for healthy conflict, growth and resilience. Narratives emphasizing complexity, multiple perspectives and nuance can prime participants for greater curiosity, in turn expanding possibilities for listening and of feeling more seen, heard and understood. While it is essential to stress that this does not mean legitimizing or amplifying others’ views and actions, nor creating false equivalencies, it is likewise imperative to emphasize that:
a) People generally want to be heard and understood and
b) Listening and understanding can catalyze belonging that, in turn, offers pressure valves out of high conflict.